Not really sure what to do with these, but currently I've going through the credits and adding links, and I've come acrosss a few pages with no films linked to them, if searching IMDb gets a hit I'll add that source but some of these are more logically best to be reused, so these are the ones I've come arcoss so far, feel free to reuse, if you find any post them here to get reused.

https://films.discogs.com/credit/154143-rober-rodriguez
https://films.discogs.com/credit/156917-ric-randing
https://films.discogs.com/credit/166671-george-johnson

Hi, I am Roberto from Italy, I would like to ask you one thing about filmogs.
This release, which is a duplicate: https://films.discogs.com/release/65261-my-bloody-valentine-april-fools-day-duplicate
I would like to know if it is correct to replace it with another, so as not to have the duplicate in the database.
Thanks,
Roberto

I'd hold off on changing duplicates of releases myself unless you can physically prove it is.

another one

https://films.discogs.com/credit/399290

all this user does is incorrectly place events and adds - too credits not explaining any changes usally adding -.

Yeah I've left comments, mostly regarding explaining the reasons for edits, their actions are more an inconvenience than acting negatively though so don't get too pushy on forcing a change, we're trying to move forward and away from the reverting wars.

TheWho87 wrote:

And another one
https://films.discogs.com/credit/168190-russel-hunter

Used
UG1002 wrote:

another one

https://films.discogs.com/credit/399290

all this user does is incorrectly place events and adds - too credits not explaining any changes usally adding -.

Used

but credit placement with london england does not match guidepines.

by guidelines, the notes are not where places go this includes city, state country etc yes its still a new rule.

Yes but the point I'm trying to make is to not exagerate things to how it was before, is what their doing incorrect, yes, should you hound them to change, no. The corrections are not being reverted so it's more an inconvenience, I'm more interested in sourcing links and info for pages with no information.

UG1002 wrote:

but credit placement with london england does not match guidepines.

by guidelines, the notes are not where places go this includes city, state country etc yes its still a new rule.

Thanks. I was unaware of this.

alexl wrote:

UG1002 wrote:

but credit placement with london england does not match guidepines.

by guidelines, the notes are not where places go this includes city, state country etc yes its still a new rule.

Thanks. I was unaware of this.

Yeah this had to be put into the guidelines because there were two systems starting to emerge, and made sence to uniformly use one system, either just use the drop-down options or put it all in the field, just makes things simpler.

I think this one fits here... No films with it and it is a duplicate credit entry.

https://films.discogs.com/credit/426826-spike-lee

Login or Register to post a reply to this topic.