Should things like this be allowed, looks like something off iafd:
https://films.discogs.com/film/424739-kaori-woman-of-father

No issues with the film itself, just the subgenres.

I think they are common subgenres of erotic films.

... they are common sub genres in pornographic, jesus christ.

do we really have to tag them all sensetive because of a name of a sub genre?

i thought this was fixed yonks ago on here with the staff saying words do not need to have a sensetive addition, plus there is in some company pages and actor / actress pages i did not create with.

pornographic bondage actor

pornographic fetish distributor

if you don't like viewing these items with these subgenres don't click on them.

like this company distributor in lesbian bondage films (Should be unmarked sensetive by what staff said in another discussion yonks ago so if they are allowed in a profile should be fine in subgenre)

https://films.discogs.com/company/295686-homs

https://films.discogs.com/credit/296106-alexis-payne saying bondage in profile

and this one was also unmarked by staff, which includes words https://films.discogs.com/company/295137-hot-body-international

also this film is not even listed on iafd, so all info was taken from viewing.

and iafd does not even list sub genres, other sities list the sub genres.

Without going all "won't someone think of the children" I think all pornographic films and releases should be tagged as sensative hiding them from the general search having individuals opt in to viewing the content.

TheWho87 wrote:

Without going all "won't someone think of the children" I think all pornographic films and releases should be tagged as sensative hiding them from the general search having individuals opt in to viewing the content.

That's what i thought when i first joined but staff said it was vandalisim tagging companies, films and credits sensetive if it included those words like bondage pornographic etc.

I don't think they should be tagged if it includes specific terms, I do agree it should be tagged for being porn.

in sensetive rules if its, high violence of cover like extreme gore etc, racisim or pornographic images to be classed sensetive.

it dosen't say "small amounts of nudity" to be classed sensetive, or just for saying its a porno film.

https://films.discogs.com/release/400873-lebendig-gefressen

https://films.discogs.com/release/334222-lebendig-gefresse

https://films.discogs.com/release/345592-cannibal-collection

https://films.discogs.com/release/345591-eaten-alive

https://films.discogs.com/release/387978-jungfrau-unter-kannibalen

If that film is supposibly sensetive do the same for all these, if those cannibal films are not sensetive then leave porn films alone and ignore them.

i do tick sensetive if i upload a poster that is porno example Sex POV 12.

TheWho87 wrote:

I don't think they should be tagged if it includes specific terms, I do agree it should be tagged for being porn.

That's what I was getting at. Something like Vampire is a legit subtype of Horror; cowgirl isn't really a subtype it's like calling a Stabbing or a Shotgun blast a subtype when they are keywords. I think bondage is a legit subgenre as it is a very different style and different audience.

With pornogrophy their films are aimed mostly atspecific targets, hence the many categories that would translate on this site as sub genres.

Most images of those cannibal flicks are on amazon too.

Anyway, I myself agree with the staff on how sensitive content should be interpreted.
Words that describe sensitive content are not necessarily sensitive themselves.

To call "Cowgirl" a subgenre seems pretty far-fetched.
It may be a category for clips on pornsites, but not really a subgenre.

Filmogs turned into a wrestling and porn marketplace a long time ago, and with no coherent philosophy regarding how to handle data I don't see the situation improving.
Too many bad decisions and too few updates means I don't see the site get the activity it needs, wether in number or quality.

You know this is no longer a marketplace right, they removed that a few months back.

And this site "turned" into a wrestling and porn site even though I'd argue they take up a fraction of the films on this site?

Login or Register to post a reply to this topic.