Should things like this be allowed, looks like something off iafd:
https://films.discogs.com/film/424739-kaori-woman-of-father

No issues with the film itself, just the subgenres.

I think they are common subgenres of erotic films.

... they are common sub genres in pornographic, jesus christ.

do we really have to tag them all sensetive because of a name of a sub genre?

i thought this was fixed yonks ago on here with the staff saying words do not need to have a sensetive addition, plus there is in some company pages and actor / actress pages i did not create with.

pornographic bondage actor

pornographic fetish distributor

if you don't like viewing these items with these subgenres don't click on them.

like this company distributor in lesbian bondage films (Should be unmarked sensetive by what staff said in another discussion yonks ago so if they are allowed in a profile should be fine in subgenre)

https://films.discogs.com/company/295686-homs

https://films.discogs.com/credit/296106-alexis-payne saying bondage in profile

and this one was also unmarked by staff, which includes words https://films.discogs.com/company/295137-hot-body-international

also this film is not even listed on iafd, so all info was taken from viewing.

and iafd does not even list sub genres, other sities list the sub genres.

Without going all "won't someone think of the children" I think all pornographic films and releases should be tagged as sensative hiding them from the general search having individuals opt in to viewing the content.

TheWho87 wrote:

Without going all "won't someone think of the children" I think all pornographic films and releases should be tagged as sensative hiding them from the general search having individuals opt in to viewing the content.

That's what i thought when i first joined but staff said it was vandalisim tagging companies, films and credits sensetive if it included those words like bondage pornographic etc.

I don't think they should be tagged if it includes specific terms, I do agree it should be tagged for being porn.

in sensetive rules if its, high violence of cover like extreme gore etc, racisim or pornographic images to be classed sensetive.

it dosen't say "small amounts of nudity" to be classed sensetive, or just for saying its a porno film.

https://films.discogs.com/release/400873-lebendig-gefressen

https://films.discogs.com/release/334222-lebendig-gefresse

https://films.discogs.com/release/345592-cannibal-collection

https://films.discogs.com/release/345591-eaten-alive

https://films.discogs.com/release/387978-jungfrau-unter-kannibalen

If that film is supposibly sensetive do the same for all these, if those cannibal films are not sensetive then leave porn films alone and ignore them.

i do tick sensetive if i upload a poster that is porno example Sex POV 12.

TheWho87 wrote:

I don't think they should be tagged if it includes specific terms, I do agree it should be tagged for being porn.

That's what I was getting at. Something like Vampire is a legit subtype of Horror; cowgirl isn't really a subtype it's like calling a Stabbing or a Shotgun blast a subtype when they are keywords. I think bondage is a legit subgenre as it is a very different style and different audience.

With pornogrophy their films are aimed mostly atspecific targets, hence the many categories that would translate on this site as sub genres.

Most images of those cannibal flicks are on amazon too.

Anyway, I myself agree with the staff on how sensitive content should be interpreted.
Words that describe sensitive content are not necessarily sensitive themselves.

To call "Cowgirl" a subgenre seems pretty far-fetched.
It may be a category for clips on pornsites, but not really a subgenre.

Filmogs turned into a wrestling and porn marketplace a long time ago, and with no coherent philosophy regarding how to handle data I don't see the situation improving.
Too many bad decisions and too few updates means I don't see the site get the activity it needs, wether in number or quality.

You know this is no longer a marketplace right, they removed that a few months back.

And this site "turned" into a wrestling and porn site even though I'd argue they take up a fraction of the films on this site?

i don't think adult databases are an allowed source, i did not add any and never will new user broadwaymj17 added 2 porn databases tok rene bond.

https://films.discogs.com/credit/432926-rene-bond

i would say no too these databases and imdb and wikipedia are the best 2 for adult actors / actresses, for very obsechre ones just a photo of there head,

Why wouldn't they be an allowed source?

Its like my think with the HKMDB site, if it's suitable as a source, use it.

BadMoon wrote:

Most images of those cannibal flicks are on amazon too.

Anyway, I myself agree with the staff on how sensitive content should be interpreted.
Words that describe sensitive content are not necessarily sensitive themselves.

To call "Cowgirl" a subgenre seems pretty far-fetched.
It may be a category for clips on pornsites, but not really a subgenre.

I could see if someone was to put this television series on this site, that "cowgirl" as a subgenre would fit, but it wouldn't really be porn...

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4878326/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0

TheWho87 wrote:

Why wouldn't they be an allowed source?

Its like my think with the HKMDB site, if it's suitable as a source, use it.

Because those adult database sities display porn.

Correct me if wrong, but I've not seen a rule not allowing to use sources that contain pornography, in fact if talking about pornography I'd expect sources linking to it.

I'd just assume it would be linking to aa reliant source.

Rather than hunting down or starting a new thread I'm gonna put it here

I saw there was Nazi and Zombie sub genres seperate, but no Nazi Zombie, since that is a bit of a genre in itself, and was wondering what would be best, how many of them to include, Nazi Zombie on it's own, Nazi Zombie & Zombie so they can be joint linked, or all three.

i know there is the dead snow series which is 3 or 4 films.

war of the dead
overlord
outpost
Shock Waves
Zombie Lake

they are all the nazi zombie flicks i can think off, i would make a seprate sub genre for Nazi Zombie as there has to be about 40 - 50 at a guess.

and would joint link nazi zombie & zombie films.

unsure if they should be added into nazi films as there was nazisploitation films etc and that will require more clean up.

I did the Dead Snow and Nazi's at the centre of the earth already, when looking up those I saw the wiki for Nazi zombies and with there being quite a few thought it made sense.

Yeah it makes sense making a Nazi Zombie subgenre.

I'm gonna bring it up again.

should porn databases be used if they display porn,

by rules images that display pornographic, adult etc have too be marked sensetibe and i thought this would be the same for links or saying porn links not allowed.

if in dought ill ask staff what they think too clear it up.

If it's the porn equivalent of IMDb I don't think it's an issue, however use the notes to identify it's a pornographic site.

Login or Register to post a reply to this topic.